Build an innovation strategy that actually works. From portfolio management to organizational alignment, these insights help innovation leaders make better decisions.
Most enterprise AI programs are failing — not because AI doesn't work, but because companies are treating a technology as a strategy. An AI innovation strategy means applying AI to accelerate your innovation methodology and measuring cost per experiment, not short-term ROI.
AI can improve ideation, validation, and support decision-making in the future. However, current implementations of AI within innovation teams can cause laziness and mediocrity. We are at risk of outsourcing our key differentiators as humans: creativity and empathy. If we let our mental muscles atrophy, our team and our AI models will overlook unconventional strategies that drive disruptive innovation. We will efficiently reinforce the status quo and stifle bold, forward-thinking decisions. Innovators should look to the future and integrate AI into innovation processes as a partner, but not at the expense of building our own skills. We should try out synthetic personas, but only in conjunction with our own validation interviews. We must learn how to spot and compensate for AI biases just as we should our own. We are spending billions of dollars to train the latest AI models. How much are you spending on training your team? For now, innovators still have an edge - but only if they invest in themselves as equal partners.
Constraints have a funny way of focusing the mind. Artificial constraints can drive innovation in your organization. Today’s challenges are recruiting tomorrow’s innovators.
Innovation isn't a singular leap; it's a series of calculated, compartmentalized steps that culminate in transformative change. Over-segmenting tasks can dilute the primary objective, while under-segmenting can lead to overwhelming challenges. Continuous feedback and agility within compartmentalized tasks ensure alignment with the broader innovation vision.
Innovation management has evolved significantly. It's no longer a rigid, one-way path but a dynamic, feedback-driven funnel. Projects can now revisit stages for further development, or take an off-ramp if they cease to align with strategic goals. This approach enables organizations to foster a more resilient, adaptable, and successful innovation process. But most of all, it increases both impact and ROI. In the rapidly changing business landscape, there's no room for static, one-size-fits-all processes. Your innovation process should foster creativity, leverage data, and maintain strategic alignment. By incorporating metered funding, data-driven decisions, bounce gates, and an offramp into your innovation process, you can enhance your new product development process and fuel your organization's future growth. Metered Funding stops funding to failing projects. Data-Driven decisions based on innovation accounting improves ROI. Bounce Gates allow pivots, which preserves lessons learned. Off Ramps for projects that don’t fit the strategy preserves option value.
The Net Present Value formula is a way of collapsing future cash inflows and outflows into today’s value for easy comparison. The Net Present Value formula is not a replacement for Innovation Accounting. The Net Present Value formula can be used within Innovation Accounting for making Pivot-or-Persevere decisions.
Learn the importance of making strategic decisions based on evidence rather than experience, and the benefits of keeping decisions close to the information to drive better outcomes in innovation projects.
Even the best-laid plans need to adapt and evolve to developing circumstances, by building agility into how we conceive and implement adaptive strategy in the first place.
Innovation strategy is about more than tackling what’s in front of you. You have to know how to find -- and manipulate -- the advantages of hidden markets.
Startups are a lot like poker in that much of the information you need is hidden from you. In this version of Startup Poker, learn how to calibrate your business model to the market you’re chasing.
The decisions made by Innovation boards hold the keys to a company’s future. Those decisions should be measured as rigorously as the projects themselves.
When calculating the costs of your innovation program, don’t forget to include opportunity costs -- the money you’re not making by doing something else.
Successful innovation accounting requires applying the right metrics to the right categories: individuals, teams, projects, portfolios, and ecosystems.
Your innovation program should be the right one for your company, but it doesn’t have to be wholly original. There's a time to create, and a time to borrow.
A healthy innovation ecosystem nurtures the relationships between its elements. By manipulating those relationships, we can maximize the value of the ecosystem.
Don’t get buried in the tools and platforms -- know how your resources, time frames, risks, and options work together to create a viable innovation portfolio map.
Fear of failure is perfectly natural, but if we let it define our business decisions, we can't truly call ourselves innovators. What we need is a safe place to fail.
If we want our company to achieve greatness, we have to empower our team members to be leaders in their own areas. That means focusing on the clarity of our mission and the capabilities of our teammates.
Diversity is a hot topic, but what is not often discussed is the fact that diverse teams are more innovative. Read more about why diversity is an innovation metric.
The anti-diversity manifesto written by a mystery Googler has put a spotlight on diversity efforts in the tech industry. Anti-diversity proponents say that meritocracy justifies the lack of diversity in tech. But the real question is: Does meritocracy work?
Asking the ROI of innovation is like asking the ROI of health insurance. We buy health insurance & innovation because the downside is potentially catastrophic.
The complete team is able to complete the Build-Measure-Learn loop including all Four Parts of the Minimum Viable Product. Including Channel & Relationship!
In a lean startup, team velocity proceeds measurable product progress. Before there is velocity, no measurable progress can be seen on any metrics dashboard.
More enterprise scale companies are drinking the lean Kool Aid and starting to implement Lean Startup. In doing so, they are failing at the most basic level.
A lot of the lean startup and customer development folks talk about creating the Minimum Viable Product (MVP), what about Minimum Viable Strategy (MVS)?