Product Development Life Cycle

In a lean business model, we need to manage our risks. We sound very intelligent when we do this, but it occasionally leads to incredibly stupid behavior.

For example, we might insist on stealth mode development so that the risk of a competitor stealing our super special sauce is mitigated. But here’s how the folks at LUXr represents the Time Spent Building Stuff vs. the Risk of Building the Wrong Stuff:

Building the Wrong Stuff

Risk from Building Wrong Stuff vs. Time Spent Building Stuff

Of course, if we build the wrong thing we get the joy of going back to the start. And since the only point at which we realize we built the wrong thing is at the end of our super long product development life cycle and PR blitzkrieg launch, we’re kind of screwed at that point.

Contrast that with working in…

Small Iterations

Risk from Building Wrong Stuff vs. Time Spent Building Stuff with Small Iterations

We can still build the wrong thing, but in this case, we only need to revert a little bit of code and/or marketing before we can proceed in the right direction. So our project never accumulates too much business risk.

Hyperbolic Risk

You may object that even if you work in one year long waterfall development cycle, you’ll only make some small errors and in that case, you can just go back a little bit and fix that one small problem. Then there wouldn’t be that much risk, right? Just like the small iterations. you’d just need to tweak your product.

Without getting into the deep technical reasons why this is going to be completely impossible if you’ve made a fundamental architectural error, let’s just look at it from an experimental point of view. How do you know which part of your product is screwing up the user experience?

The more features you build, the harder is it to tell what your users hate. Click To Tweet

Do your users want more buttons and widgets? Do they want less? Does widget A plus button B make a bad user experience but both together are confusing?

Put another way,

The more variables in your equation, the harder it is to solve Click To Tweet

But even worse,

As we build stuff for years in the basement, the market moves on... Click To Tweet

The risk in our long development cycle looks suspiciously like this:

Risk from Building Wrong Stuff vs. Time Spent Building Stuff with Real Risk, product development life cycle


The risk of building the wrong product isn't a linear function. It's hyperbolic. Click To Tweet

The actual risk may approach infinity as we compound the risk of building the wrong thing, the risk of being unable to debug the user experience, the risk of running out of funds, and the risk of feature creep.

The biggest risk is that you'll never launch at all. Click To Tweet


Make better product and business decisions with actionable data


Gain confidence that you're running the right kind of tests in a five-week series of live sessions and online exercises with our Running Better Experiments program. Refine your experiment process to reduce bias, uncover actionable results, and define clear next steps.
Reserve a seat